🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's national security strategy offers a flawed view of Europe. It claims that open-border policies and so-called "progressive" agendas pose an existential risk to European civilization. However, this perspective is based on a serious misinterpretation of the situation. The true danger confronting Europe is not societal but economic and technological backwardness.

A Glaring Economic Divide Separating Europe and the US

Statistics reveal a sobering contrast. From 2008 and 2023, American economic output surged by eighty-seven percent, compared to a mere 13.5% growth for the EU. During this time, European income per person fell from over three-quarters to just half of the US level. Remarkably, even the poorest US state now boasts a higher per capita income than major European economies like France and Italy.

Currently, about half of the global top fifty tech companies are American, while only four are from Europe.

The Technological Shortfall: The Core Question

The growing disparity is driven by superior productivity growth in the United States, fueled by technological innovation and higher total factor productivity. The landscape of world technology leadership is decidedly American. In the last five decades, hundreds of American startups have grown into enterprises valued at more than ten billion dollars, versus just 14 in the European continent.

This disparity raises a pressing question: In the race for tomorrow's sectors like semiconductors, AI, and quantum computing, what is the EU positioned? Most analysts agree it is largely a two-horse race between the United States and China, with Europe entering at a significant handicap.

Root Causes of Europe's Technological Lag

A number of major reasons account for this innovation chasm.

• Venture Capital: The United States has a far deeper and agile system for funding startups. The EU still lacks a genuine capital markets union, which caps the growth potential of emerging companies.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Complex and divided regulation hamper Europe. A US startup can launch a product under a single regulatory framework to access a market of over 330 million. The European Union, despite a larger population size, is split among 27 different national regimes, creating huge internal barriers.
• Cultural Attitudes: Attitudes toward risk-taking vary greatly. In some EU nations, a startup's collapse was once met with stigma, whereas in the United States, it is often seen as a badge of experience.
• Defense Spending: The US benefits from a deeply integrated academic-military-industrial complex. The continent's long-term lack of spending in military capabilities has eroded its capacity for pioneering research.

A Path Forward: Grounds for Cautious Optimism

In spite of these hurdles, there are causes for optimism. European leaders are increasingly aware of the severe threat and have begun to propose substantial change. Notable reports on EU competitiveness and the single market highlight the necessity of sweeping changes.

With the right incentives and regulatory reforms, these assets could support much higher levels of business-led breakthroughs.

The continent still possesses significant strengths: skilled workforce, excellent education systems, and premier labs. Alongside a vast domestic consumer base and substantial household savings, these elements could trigger a new wave of venture creation.

Crucially, even if Europe does not take the lead in developing next-generation tech, it can still dramatically boost productivity by adopting and adapting advancements from elsewhere.

An Inflection Point

Europe now stands at a critical moment. As the saying goes, economic erosion often happens "slowly, then all at once". So far, the continent's technological decline has been gradual. However, without decisive action to tackle its deep-seated problems, today's slow erosion could give way to a rapid and permanent decline in world influence.