🔗 Share this article

A Danish citizen has been convicted of sharing sexually explicit segments from protected films and television shows on the social media site Reddit.

According to a law enforcement document obtained by media outlets, the anonymous man posted 347 video excerpts of explicit content in a Reddit group he managed, which were then watched 4.2 million times.

The country's authorities state he has been handed a 7-month deferred jail term for violating copyright laws.

Legal analysts explain the man was charged under a rarely-used provision in Denmark's copyright law, with the court finding that by taking the footage out of their intended setting, the man had harmed the artists' "ethical entitlements".

He has also been convicted of distributing more than 25 terabytes of copyrighted data.

From spring 2022 to May 2023, the man known as "the pseudonym KlammereFyr" on Reddit posted sexually explicit clips featuring over 100 actresses.

He distributed them in the forum he was a administrator of.

Per the Danish copyright protection group The Rights Alliance (TRA), his subreddit had more than 6,000 members and participants were encouraged to ask for excerpts of specific actors.

In last year, advocates filed the case to the police on behalf of the affected artists, directors and producers, which resulted in the forum being shut down.

Andrea Vagn Jensen, among the actresses whose nude scenes were circulated in the community, told local broadcasters at the time she believed there was a difference between appearing naked in a movie and being shown on Reddit.

The actress said the posts constituted "abuse".

'A significant signal'

The defendant was arrested in September 2024 and pleaded culpable to the charges last month.

In a comment following the verdict, the head of the Rights Alliance the organization's leader said the outcome sent an "important" message "that violations of creators' rights has consequences".

The ruling is viewed as unprecedented in the country for its application of the "moral rights" clause of the national copyright law, which states an creator's work cannot be utilized in a way which infringes upon their reputation.

Intellectual property expert Dr Alina Trapova told BBC News the case was "rare" for its focus on the damage to the dignity of an performer, rather than to them financially.

How the case could affect nations abroad is unclear.

But she added there may be "more and more of such cases" in the coming years with the advancement of AI, where "the sanctity of an individual's creative output might be tempered with much more easily".